Rhodiola rosea L.
Rhodiola roanensis Britton
Sedum roseum (L.) Scop. orth. var.
Sedum rosea (L.) Scop.
Sedum rosea (L.) Scop. var. roanense (Britton) A. Berger
Sedum roseum (L.) Scop. var. roanense (Britton) A. Berger orth. var.
Roseroot, Golden Root, Aaron’s Rod, Arctic Root
Golden root is native to wild Arctic regions of Europe, Asia, and North America. It prefers dry, sandy ground and ocean coastlines.
Plants: 4-28" (10-70 cm) tall, with several stems and a short scaly root. The root has a roselike fragrance when cut.
Flowers: Yellow or greenish yellow, sometimes tipped with red. Plants are typically dioecious (that is, separate male and female plants); both have four petals and four sepals. Petals are about ⅛" (3.5 mm) long on staminate (male) plants and ¹/₁₆" (2.5 mm) long on pistillate (female) plants. The small flowers are clustered into dense hemispherical cymes. They appear from July to August.
Edibility: Leaves and shoots are edible raw, though bitter. Cooked like spinach, the bitterness is reduced.
Medical: Golden root is heavily promoted as a folk remedy for reducing fatigue and increasing cognitive performance. The PDR for Herbal Medicines lists several small scale studies that support this idea. But the tsunami of marketing hype makes the facts difficult to uncover. As Wikipedia summarizes:
Through 2019, human studies evaluating R. rosea did not have sufficient quality to determine whether it has properties affecting fatigue or any other condition. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued warning letters to manufacturers of R. rosea dietary supplement products unapproved as new drugs, adulterated, misbranded and in federal violation for not having proof of safety or efficacy for the advertised conditions of alleviating Raynaud syndrome, altitude sickness, depression or cancer.
A 2012 study, Rhodiola rosea for physical and mental fatigue: a systematic review found that only 11 of 206 studies of this species’ purported health benefits met the inclusion criteria for review. The analysis of those studies concludes:
The current evidence for efficacy of R. rosea is contradictory and inconclusive. Methodologically rigorous RCTs [randomized controlled trials] must be designed to overcome these serious threats to internal validity. Such studies will help inform policy-makers, health care providers, and the public about the efficacy R. rosea supplementation for physical and mental performance.
Rhodiola rosea on www.ediblewildfood.com
Rhodiola rosea on Wikimedia Commons Photos
Rhodiola rosea on Wikipedia
Rhodiola rosea on the USDA Plants Database
Rhodiola rosea on www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov A detailed assessment of research
Rhodiola rosea on www.researchgate.net
Rhodiola rosea description by Thomas H. Kent, last updated 25 May 2020.